Does your recovery
flow have a
back door?
Paste a description of your bank or fintech's account recovery process. AI analyzes it for ATO vulnerability patterns, returning a risk score, severity-ranked vulnerabilities, and specific controls to close each gap.
Three steps from description to remediation
Describe your recovery flow
Paste a plain-language or technical description of how your institution handles account recovery, identity verification, or the full lifecycle from onboarding through deactivation. No code required.
AI maps vulnerability patterns
GPT-4o analyzes the flow against known ATO attack patterns — SIM-swapping, OSINT-assisted KBA bypass, support channel social engineering, dormant account exploitation, and more. Each vulnerability is linked to a specific attack vector.
Receive a scored, actionable report
Get a 0–100 risk score with tier classification, a ranked vulnerability breakdown with severity levels, lifecycle gap analysis across onboarding through offboarding, and specific control recommendations for each gap.
"Account recovery is the #1 ATO entry point — attackers don't break in through the front door. They walk through the recovery gate you left open."
Financial institutions face a structural problem: product, security, fraud, and compliance teams each own different pieces of the identity lifecycle. The gaps between them are where attackers operate. The Synapse/Yotta collapse in 2024 is one documented example of lifecycle fragmentation leading to systemic failure.
Fissure was built to surface those gaps before an attacker finds them.
Analyze your recovery flow
Describe how users recover account access at your institution. Include authentication methods, verification steps, support escalation paths, and any self-service options. The more detail, the more precise the analysis.
Your vulnerability report will appear here
Lifecycle Gap Analysis
Vulnerability Breakdown
Priority Controls
Analysis failed. Please try again.